Right Groups Blast US Federal Appeals Court Ruling Giving Washington Green Light for Secret Arrests Washington, June 18 (Radio Havana Cuba) - Human rights groups are blasting a US federal appeals court ruling Tuesday that allows the government to withhold names and other information about hundreds of Muslim immigrants rounded up after the September 11 terrorist attacks. Human Rights Watch warned that the decision would open the door to widespread secret detentions on immigration charges, while the American Civil Liberties Union charged that the appeals court ignored mounting evidence of systematic government misconduct and abuse - documented just two weeks ago in a major report by the Justice Department's Inspector General - in its treatment of more than 700 detainees. ACLU Legal Director Steven Shapiro called secret arrests "odious in a democratic society." "Secrecy breeds abuses," said Shapiro, adding that "a government of the people and for the people must be visible to the people." Kate Martin, a lawyer for the Washington-based Center for National Security Studies suggested that her group and other organizations that had brought the case to court would probably appeal it to the Supreme Court, calling the ruling "the first time ever that a US court has sanctioned secret arrests." The 2-1 ruling by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia drew a harsh dissenting opinion from Judge David Tatel, who accused his colleagues of "uncritical deference to the government's vague, poorly explained arguments for withholding broad categories of information about the detainees," which, he added, "is in violation of their constitutional rights." The ruling is said to mark the latest in a string of major victories for Attorney General John Ashcroft, who has widely been accused of whittling away at constitutional rights and civil liberties under the pretext of the so-called war on terrorism. The Bush administration so far has largely withstood challenges to its broad use of a powerful surveillance law, its closing of immigration hearings and its use of enemy combatant laws to prosecute US citizens accused of ties to terrorists.